Phase Shift: Adapting a Three-Phase Screw Compressor for Single-Phase Power
(Write-up complete, images in progress!)
Some years ago, I needed a serious air compressor to power a large blast cabinet in my shop. I stumbled across a Craigslist ad for a Kaeser SX-7 screw compressor and an 80-gallon vertical tank. Delivering 30 CFM at 110 PSI this 7.5 HP German-engineered beast was exactly what I needed.
There was just one catch: it required 208V three-phase power, and my shop only has standard US 240V split-phase service. Confident I could engineer a straightforward retrofit, I messaged the seller. The exchange went something like this:
Me: "Hi, I'm interested in your Kaeser compressor. What's the backstory?"
Seller: "Works great, low hours, recently serviced. I ran it at my commercial auto shop before closing down. I actually bought a VFD to run it on single-phase at home, but decided it was overkill."
Sounds like typical marketplace oversell, but promising.
Me: "Nice. Can I come hear it run?"
Seller: "Sure, but I actually can't run it right now. I hooked up the VFD and heard a loud 'pop.' I think the VFD is fine, so I'll throw it in for free."
Ah. I immediately realized he likely treated a VFD like a plug-and-play rotary phase converter, hoping I wouldn't know the difference.
Me: "Gotcha. Would you be willing to drop the price a bit? A proper industrial VFD from ABB or Allen-Bradley is going to run me at least a grand."
Seller: "Well okay, but a new VFD is only $200..." (sends an Amazon link to an undersized, impossible-to-pronounce brand VFD).
Me (Thinking that explains one reason it popped): "No worries, you can keep that VFD. I'll source a proper one."
A few hours later, the price was negotiated, the deal was done, and I trailered the compressor back to my shop, ready for a proper engineering overhaul.
Some years ago, I needed a serious air compressor to power a large blast cabinet in my shop. I stumbled across a Craigslist ad for a Kaeser SX-7 screw compressor and an 80-gallon vertical tank. Delivering 30 CFM at 110 PSI this 7.5 HP German-engineered beast was exactly what I needed.
There was just one catch: it required 208V three-phase power, and my shop only has standard US 240V split-phase service. Confident I could engineer a straightforward retrofit, I messaged the seller. The exchange went something like this:
Me: "Hi, I'm interested in your Kaeser compressor. What's the backstory?"
Seller: "Works great, low hours, recently serviced. I ran it at my commercial auto shop before closing down. I actually bought a VFD to run it on single-phase at home, but decided it was overkill."
Sounds like typical marketplace oversell, but promising.
Me: "Nice. Can I come hear it run?"
Seller: "Sure, but I actually can't run it right now. I hooked up the VFD and heard a loud 'pop.' I think the VFD is fine, so I'll throw it in for free."
Ah. I immediately realized he likely treated a VFD like a plug-and-play rotary phase converter, hoping I wouldn't know the difference.
Me: "Gotcha. Would you be willing to drop the price a bit? A proper industrial VFD from ABB or Allen-Bradley is going to run me at least a grand."
Seller: "Well okay, but a new VFD is only $200..." (sends an Amazon link to an undersized, impossible-to-pronounce brand VFD).
Me (Thinking that explains one reason it popped): "No worries, you can keep that VFD. I'll source a proper one."
A few hours later, the price was negotiated, the deal was done, and I trailered the compressor back to my shop, ready for a proper engineering overhaul.
|
With the compressor in my shop, I call Kaeser for the service manual. One beautiful thing about this compressor (and selling point for me during inspection) is that Kaeser glued a printout of the 4-page wiring diagram to the inside of the control cabinet door.
Me: "Hi, I bought a used SX7 with serial number and am looking to get a service manual. Also, could you tell me when the unit was last serviced and what was done?" Kaeser rep: "It looks like we were out in 2008 to look at it, but we have no record of any maintenance ever done on it". In other words, "recently serviced" to the seller meant 15 years ago a Kaeser tech glanced at it. The service manual is sent via email a few hours later. |
|
After studying the P&ID and wiring diagrams, I sketched up working drawings of the system under load and under idle to help with future troubleshooting and maintenance. The image shows the PID with start-up and idle air / oil flow.
|
|
The mechanical operation of the Kaeser SX-7 is clever, relying on internal pressure differentials rather than external pumps:
|
|
As for the controls, safety and diagnostics are handled by a dedicated control unit that continuously monitors oil temperature, compressor outlet pressure, and motor overload status. If any fault condition is triggered, the unit immediately cuts power to the main motor contactor circuit.
Under normal operating conditions, the system executes a specific startup and load cycle:
|
|
Armed with an understanding of system function, and after inspecting the black soot covered air filter, it became apparent that while the unit looked relatively clean, it was rarely if ever maintained. I ordered air and oil filters, compressor oil and an oil/air separator.
To begin maintenance, the belts were removed and inspected, air filter replaced, oil filter removed, oil drained and the oil sump cover plate was removed. The oil filter took an enormous amount of force to remove, and the air/oil separator was stuck crusted into the sump opening, to the point where a large crowbar was required to pry it out. |
|
Upon inspecting the oil sump, I discovered what appeared to be crusted rust flakes originating from the interior walls. Rather than risking catastrophic contamination, this observation prompted a complete teardown: I pulled the sump entirely to hand-clean and flush out every trace of debris. While the system was open, I also pulled and cleaned the aftercooler.
With the fluid paths cleaned up, everything was reassembled and filled with fresh OEM Kaeser compressor oil. As a final precaution before the first spin-up, I removed the air intake and poured a small amount of oil directly into the screws, hand-rotating the compressor pulley to ensure the air end was thoroughly pre-lubricated for startup. |
|
With maintenance complete, it was time for the real engineering to begin.
The control elements are neatly housed in a dedicated cabinet within the compressor enclosure. Electrically, the system splits into two distinct paths: the high-power compressor motor and the control logic. As is typical for mid-sized industrial machinery driven by induction motors, the control system runs on single-phase power even though the main motor requires three-phase. In the factory configuration, a 100VA control transformer steps down two legs of the 208V three-phase input to 115V to power the relays, contactors, and solenoids. This made the control logic conversion relatively straightforward: I replaced the original transformer with a Hammond open-core 240V-to-120V, 100VA unit. I kept the primary fusing at the manufacturer-specified 1A. Because inductive contactor coils and solenoid loads draw slightly less steady-state current at 120V than at 115V, the existing fuses remained perfectly adequate. Furthermore, 1A fusing safely satisfies the 300% maximum primary overcurrent protection allowed by the NEC to accommodate transformer inrush currents. The image captures the halfway point of an early design iteration aimed at maximizing the reuse of factory three-phase components. |
|
Space constraints inside the integrated enclosure quickly forced a design pivot. Realizing there wasn't enough room to house both the logic and the power electronics, I decided to build a completely separate, external VFD enclosure to handle the mains power distribution.
In order to keep with the original factory functionality, I modified the factory wiring to map the new hardware into the Kaeser's original logic:
While working inside the panel, I also replaced a dead start-switch LED (left) and swapped out a cracked E-stop button. |
|
With the planned VFD cabinet separate, I stripped the unnecessary three-phase components from the factory cabinet and cleaned up the original wiring. To route the new architecture, I drilled a new hole for the motor leads and repurposed three existing holes—outfitted with cable glands—to run the mains input, the VFD start signal, and the motor overload feedback signal. The remaining unused factory holes were plugged.
Interestingly, Kaeser didn't strictly adhere to NFPA 79 standards regarding grounded AC control wiring colors; they bypassed the traditional white conductor for the neutral side of the single-phase control circuit. However, because their documentation was explicit about this deviation, I followed suit to maintain consistency with the factory schematics. The image to the left shows the final, commissioned control panel layout. |
|
With the controls modifications solidified, I turned my attention to the motor circuit. The motor nameplate specifies a Full Load Amperage (FLA) of 20.9A at 208V 3-phase. To synthesize 3-phase power from the shop’s 240V single-phase supply, a Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) was the ideal solid-state solution.
The selection criteria required a budget-friendly drive that met these exact constraints:
|
|
To meet these requirements, I selected an AutomationDirect GS23-2015—a 15 HP general-purpose drive capable of delivering a continuous constant-torque rating of 24.5A on a single-phase 230V input.
Proper sizing is critical when running a three-phase VFD on single-phase utility power. Because single-phase rectification produces significantly larger current peaks and higher continuous DC bus voltage ripple than three-phase power, the drive's front-end rectifier diodes and bulk DC bus capacitors experience higher thermal stress. Upsizing to a 15 HP unit provided the necessary diode current capacity and larger DC bus capacitors with lower ESR, mitigating ripple current heating and ensuring long-term reliability. |
|
While the plan was to power the system from a standard NEMA 6-50R outlet on a 50A circuit, I needed to verify the expected input RMS current. Starting with the conservation of real electrical power on the motor nameplate (7.5hp ≈ 5.5kW):
Solving for motor power factor yields pf = 0.80.
Next, assuming a VFD efficiency of 97% and a typical single-phase front-end total power factor of roughly 0.6, I calculated the single-phase input current at full motor load: 
An expected full-load input draw of ~43.3A RMS falls safely within the short-term thermal capacity of a dedicated 50A branch circuit, especially considering the compressor only operates at maximum loading for limited duty cycles.
|
|
Once the VFD arrived, I slipped the drive belts off and wired the unit on the bench for preliminary testing. The motor terminal box was modified to accommodate VFD cable, with the overall shield properly bonded at both ends to ground to suppress high-frequency common-mode noise.
Because the compressor was manufactured around 2004, its 20-plus-year-old induction motor predates many modern inverter-duty insulation standards. Lacking OEM specs on the winding insulation class, I decided to play it safe and lower the VFD carrier frequency to the minimum setting of 3 kHz. Reducing the switching frequency minimizes the rate of voltage rise (dV/dt), mitigating high-voltage ringing spikes that can degrade aged motor insulation (more on this later). With safety precautions in place, I entered the nameplate parameters, enabled Sensorless Vector Control (SVC), programmed 4-second acceleration and deceleration ramps, and executed a dynamic auto-tune sequence. The unloaded spin-up went flawlessly: the motor ran smooth and quiet, and all essential magic smoke remained safely inside the windings. |
|
With the bench test successful, I reattached the drive belts, terminated the control and fault cables, and hooked the outlet line up to the air tank. I adjusted the native idle and startup timers in the Kaeser enclosure slightly to account for the VFD’s four-second ramp-up time, then flipped the main switch.
Success. The system initialized, brought the compressor up to speed, and loaded smoothly without a hitch. After letting the machine run up to operating temperature and cycling continuously through load/unload states for about 40 minutes, I powered it down to pull data and take a few baseline electrical measurements. |
|
With the system operational, the next engineering task was determining whether power conditioning was necessary to tame the harmonic currents drawn by the drive. The only definitive way to know was to examine the raw waveforms under load. Armed with a high-voltage differential probe, a Fluke oscilloscope current clamp, and a Fluke 87V multimeter, I set out to capture baseline electrical data.
First, I recorded the RMS input voltage and current across various compressor load states. At the maximum 115 psi cut-out pressure, input current peaked at 46A—slightly higher than my initial 43.3A calculation, but consistent with a measured motor draw of 21.8A (just over its 20.9A nameplate rating). Then I hooked up the scope. The scope trace revealed a staggering result: at full load, the single-phase peak current spikes feeding the VFD exceeded 100A, with even the idle state (left) pulling almost 50A peaks! This is where a line reactor proves its worth. Because a three-phase diode bridge operating on a single-phase line draws current in narrow, high-amplitude pulses, a significant portion of that total RMS draw is non-fundamental harmonic current. Adding series inductance at the VFD input smooths out those steep peaks—filtering higher-order harmonics and pulling down total RMS current without restricting fundamental 60Hz power. As a bonus, it provides line-transient protection for the shop. |
|
Drive manuals typically specify matching input line reactors based on an impedance target of 3% to 5% of the full-load input impedance seen at the drive terminals, with 5% offering superior harmonic mitigation.
However, all of the reactors recommended in the manual were standard 3% units. For my drive, the manual suggested the LR-2020—a three-phase reactor with a per-coil inductance of 0.175mH. To determine what inductance was actually required for a true 5% impedance rating on single-phase 240V power, I calculated the target input impedance: 
This gives a required per coil inductance of:
This meant the recommended LR-2020 (0.175mH) provided roughly half of the inductance needed for a 5% system—definitely on the low side for aggressive harmonic suppression.
Looking at alternative options:
|
|
To better understand the harmonic profile of the system, I performed a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) on the input current waveform at full compressor load.
The FFT revealed that harmonic content was concentrated predominantly in the lower orders—specifically the 3rd (180 Hz), 5th (300 Hz) and 7th (420 Hz) harmonics. This spectrum aligned with expectations; under heavy load, the DC bus filter capacitors draw current over a wider conduction angle, smoothing the waveform profile compared to the sharp, narrow current spikes characteristic of light-load conditions. Given that the harmonic energy was concentrated at these lower frequencies, I questioned whether a standard 3% line reactor would provide sufficient impedance to noticeably reduce distortion. However, technical support at AutomationDirect confirmed that the LR-2020 was the manufacturer-recommended model for this single-phase application. To evaluate the real-world impact on input current total harmonic distortion THD and DC bus ripple, I acquired both the LR-2020 (20hp rating) and the LR-2015 (15hp rating) for empirical testing. |
|
Upon bench-testing both line reactors, empirical measurements confirmed my initial hypothesis: the reduction in input current harmonic distortion was modest, decreasing the drive's total input current draw by approximately 2-3 Arms under load.
To achieve higher percent impedance (%Z) and further attenuate low-order harmonics, I evaluated two potential design alternatives:
Upon contemplation, rather than delaying the project to procure a 460V reactor, I opted to install the LR-2015 to get the compressor operational, leaving the high-impedance reactor upgrade for a future project. |
|
With the VFD input conditioning settled for the time being, I turned my attention to the output side of the drive.
I was dealing with a 20+ year-old 7.5hp induction motor designed for a clean sine wave input, not the high-frequency PWM switching pulses of a modern drive. The last thing I wanted was to prematurely destroy an old workhorse with bearing fluting or winding insulation failure. In VFD application engineering, output filtering generally falls into three tiers of waveform smoothing: load reactors, dV/dt filters, and full sine wave filters. Selection is typically driven by cable length; long motor leads introduce parasitic inductance and capacitance, triggering reflected voltage waves at the motor terminals that can spike well beyond the DC bus voltage and punch through insulation. While my installation used a short 10-foot run—making reflected waves less of a concern—protecting this non-inverter-duty motor still felt like a prudent investment. AutomationDirect didn't offer full sine wave filters in their budget line, but they did carry both load reactors and dV/dt filters. To establish a baseline before picking a filter, I hooked up the scope to capture motor terminal voltage under full load and phase current. (Unfortunately, the only current trace I managed to save was from the no-load run, but the overall waveform trends held true when fully loaded). |
|
Examining the raw voltage scope traces revealed clear ringing alongside a roughly 150V peak overshoot above the nominal DC bus voltage. This brought the total peak voltage to around 490V.
While 490V is well below the insulation breakdown thresholds typically specified for IEC non-inverter-duty motors—even those from two decades ago—the motor's age and my own engineering curiosity got the better of me. Beyond the voltage spikes, the current waveform was heavily loaded with high-frequency switching harmonics centered around the VFD’s 3kHz carrier frequency, which promised to introduce extra parasitic heating into the windings. Driven by a desire to tame those voltage transients and smooth out the current draw, I ordered two options from AutomationDirect to test back-to-back: an LR-27P5 line/load reactor and a VTF-4-M dV/dt filter. |
|
First up for testing was the LR-27P5 load reactor. Looking at the motor terminal voltage waveform, while a 110V overshoot transient still existed after installation, the high-frequency ringing was significantly reduced. In addition, inserting this series inductance helped clean up the motor current waveform to a noticeable degree as well.
|
|
Next up for bench comparison was the LR-27P5’s primary competitor: the VTF-4-M dV/dt filter. Thanks to the additional RC damping network built into the unit, peak overshoot dropped further—from 110V down to 86V—while virtually eliminating the high-frequency voltage ringing entirely. On the current side, the output waveform appeared very similar to the load reactor's results. Although the VT filter carries a higher price tag, its superior voltage spike suppression made it the clear winner for permanent installation.
|
|
With line and load filtering settled, attention shifted to the enclosure layout. On the protection side, I opted for an ABB MS165-42 self-protected combination controller I already had in the shop, routing the neutral/return through the L2/T2 and L3/T3 legs to properly balance all three poles.
Though the MS165 offered more than enough short-circuit interrupting capacity and ran cleanly without nuisance tripping at its 42Arms limit, the installation is strictly non-compliant with NEC Article 430. Beyond missing its Type E line terminal spacer, the unit is undersized relative to the VFD’s peak current rating and lacks the manufacturer’s listing for this specific drive. I chose this route over fuses specifically to access the auxiliary trip feedback for my Kaeser diagnostic unit and start-latch circuit—though in a commercial or strictly code-compliant build, a UL 489 circuit breaker paired with an auxiliary switch would be the correct solution. |
|
The final major layout consideration was thermal management. Knowing the drive and filter heat dissipation would require forced ventilation, I installed a Pfannenberg enclosure thermostat to trigger an intake fan once internal temperatures exceeded set point.
To size the airflow, while IEC TR 60890 outlines a detailed methodology for calculating internal enclosure temperature gradients across heights, panel manufacturer Rittal offers a practical simplification grounded in standard heat transfer and energy conservation principles: 
Active fan cooling relies on the ambient room temperature remaining below the target enclosure temperature, allowing a portion of the heat load to conduct naturally through the cabinet walls. By applying a steady-state open-system energy balance to the air stream—assuming ideal gas behavior, negligible air friction, and constant air density/velocity across the enclosure—the required volumetric airflow simplifies to:
where ρ is the altitude-adjusted air density, cp is the specific heat of air, Wdot is the fan motor power, and SF is a safety factor (typically 1.2) to account for filter mat restriction over time.
|
|
Being an engineer, I naturally had these heat transfer equations queued up in a spreadsheet—it’s what we do. Tallying the heat dissipation from the VFD, reactor, and auxiliary components yielded a not-insignificant 360 W—a high thermal density for a compact 24″ × 20″ × 12″ enclosure. Designing for an expected peak ambient of 80°F and a target internal limit of 95°F required roughly 112 CFM of airflow (accounting for a 1.2 safety factor and conservative cabinet heat transfer coefficient).
Practical engineering is always an exercise in trade-offs. Comparing single-grille fan curves between the Hoffman HF09 and HF10 (IP54) series, the larger HF10 hit my airflow target. However, component cost and immediate availability led me to source a surplus HF09 at a fraction of the price. A formal recalculation during this write-up confirms the HF10 remains the ideal worst-case spec. Nevertheless, the physical build has run for several years without any thermal issues. Thanks to the cool shop environment and a modest compressor duty cycle, modifying the cabinet sheet metal for a larger cutout isn't currently justified—though the baseline calculations establish a clear upgrade path if site conditions ever shift. |
|
The next item on the list was upgrading the air fittings. Two decades of service had left the original steel air outlet fitting completely galvanically corroded inside the aluminum aftercooler port. Since the final spatial layout of the compressor, dryer, filters, and receiver tank was still fluid, flexible hose was the best route—meaning I needed a corrosion-resistant transition.
To eliminate dissimilar metal contact at the highest-moisture node in the system, I adapted the aftercooler’s BSPP (G) port using an aluminum G-to-NPT adapter, followed by an NPT-to-barb fitting for ¾” hose. This provided the layout flexibility I needed while mitigating future galvanic attack. Because aluminum-on-aluminum threads are notorious for galling, I applied a liberal layer of PTFE tape and tightened the threads very slowly during installation. |
|
Although the initial drive for this project was powering a blast cabinet and pneumatic tools, I wanted the setup to handle automotive painting and priming down the road. High-end paint work leaves zero room for moisture or oil contamination, which quickly manifests as fish eyes, orange peel, or poor adhesion.
To quantify these requirements, ISO 8573-1 classifies compressed air purity across three metrics: solid particles, water/vapor, and oil carryover. Standard air tools and media blasting are well-served by a Class 4.4.4 specification, whereas automotive paint applications require a much cleaner Class 1.2.1 standard. Having seen far too many air receiver tanks turn into water reservoirs over time, installing a dedicated air dryer upstream of the tank was non-negotiable. I opted for an Ingersoll Rand D42IN refrigerated dryer—a unit capable of handling the compressor’s CFM output while pulling the pressure dew point down to +37°F (Class 4 water rating) without breaking the bank (although more on that last statement in another write-up). |
|
To meet the stringent particulate and oil purity targets, I selected a MetalWork Syntesi modular filter combination (standard particulate plus fine coalescing) paired with an automatic drain plumbed to a waste condensate reservoir. This would be followed downstream by a Norgren Excelon activated carbon oil-vapor removal filter, theoretically positioning the air stream to achieve an ISO 8573-1 Class 1.4.0 rating.
Managing multi-vendor compressed air systems often presents a material compatibility challenge: the Norgren housing is die-cast aluminum, the Syntesi ports are nickel-plated brass, and the receiver vessel is low-carbon steel. In a high-moisture environment, joining dissimilar metals can initiate galvanic corrosion, with the rate of degradation dictated by the potential difference between the metals on the galvanic series. To mitigate galvanic attack, I carefully matched the fitting metallurgy to each parent port where possible—using aluminum barbed fittings in aluminum threads (backed by generous PTFE tape), brass fittings in the nickel-plated brass ports, and zinc-electroplated steel fittings at the tank ports. Finally, interconnecting the entire system with non-conductive, 200 PSI EPDM hose isolated the individual components electrically. |
|
Based on some literature advocating for early oil removal, I initially installed the entire filter bank upstream of the D42IN refrigerated dryer, right at the compressor outlet. In practice, this proved to be a flawed layout. Raw compressed air directly off the compressor is saturated with bulk liquid water and hot water vapor—an environment highly destructive to fine 0.01 µm coalescing micro-glass fibers and fatal to activated carbon adsorption beds. While the centrifugal moisture stage knocked out bulk liquid, heavy aerosol carryover quickly overwhelmed the particulate bowl and migrated into the coalescing filter, causing it to saturate. This highlighted the flaw in the layout and prompted a complete redesign of the filtration sequence.
|
|
To resolve the issue, I revised the layout by installing a basic Syntesi particulate/bulk moisture separator upstream of the dryer—as required by Ingersoll Rand's installation specs—and eliminated the pre-tank oil filtration stage entirely. The Kaeser compressor already features a built-in internal air/oil separator, and the upstream mechanical filter knocks down oil aerosols to an ISO Class 4 baseline, with much of the remainder condensing out inside the refrigerated dryer. Because media blasting and general air tools are insensitive to trace oil vapor, routing high volumetric flow through fine sub-micron elements creates unnecessary pressure drop and prematurely degrades expensive filter media.
In the optimized layout, the tank line runs directly to the tool and blast cabinet drops, while the fine coalescing and activated carbon vapor filters were relocated downstream—immediately preceding a point-of-use desiccant dryer at the spray paint drop. This targeted point-of-use approach traps critical contaminants only where they actually impact finish quality, maximizing filter element lifespan, minimizing line pressure drop, and significantly reducing operating costs. |
|
When I purchased the air receiver, the previous owner assured me he drained the condensate at the end of every work day. However, after seeing the internal corrosion inside the compressor sump during teardown, I decided not to take his word for it and opted to de-rust the tank interior. I chose Evapo-Rust—a non-toxic chelating agent that selectively binds to iron oxide to strip rust down to bare steel without attacking parent metal. It works exceptionally well with a few days of soaking, but at roughly $30 a gallon, filling an entire 80-gallon vertical tank was financially impractical.
To optimize chemical coverage on a budget, I modeled the tank in CAD to calculate the liquid volume needed to submerge the interior walls when laid horizontally. I determined that a single 5-gallon bucket of Evapo-Rust was sufficient if I rotated the tank along its longitudinal axis in 45° increments every three days (covering the cylindrical shell in eight stages), followed by three days each on the top and bottom heads. After a month-long rotation process, the interior was completely stripped to bare steel, ready for service, after which I sanded, primed, and repainted the exterior. |
|
To finalize the build, I routed a ¾” Type M copper header along the wall, sweating the branches together to create a low-friction distribution network that minimizes line pressure drop compared to flexible line. To simplify maintenance, I installed full-port ball valves at key strategic points: the bottom tank drain, the main receiver outlet, and the terminal end of the header to facilitate isolation and condensate blow-down. The image to the left shows the air tool and paint drop just after initial installation (prior to filter swap).
|
|
After placing all of the air system components in their final locations, and with all mechanical, electrical, and pneumatic connections secured, it was time for the initial start-up. The system energized and pressurized flawlessly—holding tight with zero air leaks, delivering exceptionally dry air, and a solid, efficient setup fully ready for shop duty.
|